2.1. Initial syntheses

2.2. Recent developments

2.3. A different perspective

3.1. Bilateral monopoly with zero transaction costs

3.2. Bilateral monopoly with positive transaction costs and externalities

3.3. Bilateral monopoly with positive transaction costs and structural alternatives for internalizing externalities

4.1. MMK — RUSAL

4.2. Sayanskhimplast — Rosneft

4.3. Uralkali — Solikamsk Magnesium Plant

3.4. Some lessons from these cases

5.1. Bilateral monopoly in Russian legislation

5.2. Alternative modes of intervention