Other versions:

(Verbatim name)

ID

(Catalog Number)

ORG

DES

Invalid DOI was provided, please try again

XML
PDF
 
 
Twitter
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Notify a colleague
  • ContentsContents
  • Article InfoArticle Info
  • CiteCite
  • MetricsMetrics
  • CommentComment
  • RelatedRelated
  • TabsTabs
  • RefsRefs
  • CitedCited
  • Article title
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • 1. Introduction
  • 2. Major provisions of China’s Anti-Monopoly Law
    • 2.1. Sanctions
    • 2.2. Enforcement
  • 3. Administrative monopolies and Fair Competition Review
  • 4. The role of economics in antitrust in China
    • 4.1. Definition of relevant market
    • 4.2. Use of economics in prohibiting monopoly agreements
    • 4.3. Role of economics in abuse of market dominance cases
    • 4.3.1. The Qualcomm case (2015)
    • 4.3.2. The Tetra Pak case (2016)
    • 4.3.3. Provincial AML enforcers and the Eastman case (2019)
    • 4.4. The role of economic analysis in merger review
    • 4.4.1. Economic theories for competition review of horizontal mergers in China
    • 4.4.2. Economic framework for assessing non-horizontal mergers in China
  • 5. Private actions and acceptance of economic evidence in courts
    • 5.1. Stand-alone cases
    • 5.2. Follow-on cases and further discussion on RPM
  • 6. Challenges and concluding remarks
  • References
Subscribe to email alerts for current Article's categories
Powered by