
<rss version="0.91">
    <channel>
        <title>Latest Articles from Russian Journal of Economics</title>
        <description>Latest 5 Articles from Russian Journal of Economics</description>
        <link>https://rujec.org/</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Thu, 8 Oct 2026 09:54:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Pensoft FeedCreator</generator>
        
	
		<item>
		    <title>Improving pension savings investing: The case of Russia</title>
		    <link>https://rujec.org/article/115594/</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[
					<p>Russian Journal of Economics 10(1): 34-59</p>
					<p>DOI: 10.32609/j.ruje.10.115594</p>
					<p>Authors: Alexander E. Abramov, Maria I. Chernova</p>
					<p>Abstract: Many countries seek to improve their pension systems by introducing corporate and individual savings plans to address the challenges of demography, social security, and economy. However, the establishing of a long-term, reliable savings system encounters multiple impediments. The retrospective analysis of Russian pension reforms offers some recommendations on solving the typical problems faced by reformers. Thus, in 2002 the Russian pension system was implemented by a mandatory savings pillar, which 20 years later the Ministry of Finance substituted by voluntary savings. As this period appeared shorter than the average life span, this measure proved ineffective in increasing pension payouts for future retirees. The frequent regulatory changes and the shrinking workforce coverage as the state prioritized the welfare of the current pension recipients also infringed upon the interests of future retirees. Pension savings investments were further affected by the economic policy aimed at the minimal return requirements which resulted in a more conservative asset allocation strategy and inefficient active management in non-state pension funds. The study demonstrates that policy actions to overcome these impediments and to raise the replacement rates for future retirees should include (a) steady regulations within a pension savings system of no shorter than 40 years; (b) the savings pillar covering no less than 80% of the workforce; and (c) the asset allocation strategy involving a bigger share of equity, longer time horizon and clear benchmarks. These recommendations can be applied to emerging market economies concerned with improving and reforming their pension systems.</p>
					<p><a href="https://rujec.org/article/115594/">HTML</a></p>
					<p><a href="https://rujec.org/article/115594/download/xml/">XML</a></p>
					<p><a href="https://rujec.org/article/115594/download/pdf/">PDF</a></p>
			]]></description>
		    <category>Research Article</category>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2024 20:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		</item>
	
		<item>
		    <title>Inequalities in middle-income Europe and Central Asia: A tale of three studies</title>
		    <link>https://rujec.org/article/49296/</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[
					<p>Russian Journal of Economics 5(4): 441-448</p>
					<p>DOI: 10.32609/j.ruje.5.49296</p>
					<p>Authors: Ben Slay, Tahmina Anvarova</p>
					<p>Abstract: This paper focuses on how questions of inequalities in middle-income countries in Europe and Central Asia are dealt with in three recent studies: the EBRD’s “Transition Report 2016–17”; the World Bank’s 2018 study “Toward a new social contract: Taking on distributional tensions in Europe and Central Asia”; and UNDP’s “Regional human development report 2016. Progress at risk: Inequalities and human development in Eastern Europe, Turkey, and Central Asia.” While the three studies differ in terms of objectives, conceptual frameworks, country coverage, data and indicators, and policy recommendations, they also share important commonalities — particularly in terms of creating “regional” inequality narratives for transition economies, reconciling official data with common perceptions of inequalities in the region; improving data quality, quantity and availability, and changes in tax and social policies.</p>
					<p><a href="https://rujec.org/article/49296/">HTML</a></p>
					<p><a href="https://rujec.org/article/49296/download/xml/">XML</a></p>
					<p><a href="https://rujec.org/article/49296/download/pdf/">PDF</a></p>
			]]></description>
		    <category>Research Article</category>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2019 11:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		</item>
	
		<item>
		    <title>Fiscal maneuver and restructuring of the Russian economy</title>
		    <link>https://rujec.org/article/27990/</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[
					<p>Russian Journal of Economics 3(3): 221-239</p>
					<p>DOI: 10.1016/j.ruje.2017.09.001</p>
					<p>Authors: Alexey Kudrin, Ilya Sokolov</p>
					<p>Abstract: The paper discusses fiscal policy parameters through 2024. The suggested way to ensure long-term fiscal stability is stabilizing both the general government revenues and expenditures as percentages of GDP at levels differing by the public debt service payments and then applying a new version of the fiscal rule. The redistribution of fiscal spending from unproductive to productive areas (primarily investment in human and physical capital) is considered to boost economic growth. The possible use of additional spending on education, public health, and transport systems is presented, as is the optimization of expenditures in nonproductive areas.</p>
					<p><a href="https://rujec.org/article/27990/">HTML</a></p>
					<p><a href="https://rujec.org/article/27990/download/xml/">XML</a></p>
					<p><a href="https://rujec.org/article/27990/download/pdf/">PDF</a></p>
			]]></description>
		    <category>Research Article</category>
		    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		</item>
	
		<item>
		    <title>Long-term portfolio investments: New insight into return and risk</title>
		    <link>https://rujec.org/article/27952/</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[
					<p>Russian Journal of Economics 1(3): 273-293</p>
					<p>DOI: 10.1016/j.ruje.2015.12.001</p>
					<p>Authors: Alexander Abramov, Alexander Radygin, Maria Chernova</p>
					<p>Abstract: This article analyzes the impact of the increase of an investment horizon on the comparative advantages of the basic asset classes and on the principles of constructing the investment strategy. It demonstrates that the traditional approach of portfolio management theory, which states that investments in stocks are preferable over bonds in terms of their long-run risk–return trade-offs, is by no means always consistent with empirical evidence. This article proves the opposite, i.e., that for long-term investors, investments in corporate bonds are more profitable in terms of the risk–return ratio than investments in stocks, arguing in favor of strategies pursued by pension funds and other institutional investors focused primarily on investments in fixed-income instruments, including infrastructural bonds. Emphasis is placed on the need for regular adjustments to long-term investors’ portfolios. As portfolios get older, those investors see a reduction in the returns’ dispersion, while differences in risk between various portfolios increase. This means that to maintain a fixed risk–return ratio for a portfolio as the horizon increases, an investor needs to increase the share of lower-risk financial assets during asset allocation process. This thesis becomes especially relevant in the context of retirement savings management.</p>
					<p><a href="https://rujec.org/article/27952/">HTML</a></p>
					<p><a href="https://rujec.org/article/27952/download/xml/">XML</a></p>
					<p><a href="https://rujec.org/article/27952/download/pdf/">PDF</a></p>
			]]></description>
		    <category>Research Article</category>
		    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		</item>
	
		<item>
		    <title>The fiscal gap: An estimate for Russia</title>
		    <link>https://rujec.org/article/27950/</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[
					<p>Russian Journal of Economics 1(3): 240-256</p>
					<p>DOI: 10.1016/j.ruje.2015.12.002</p>
					<p>Authors: Evgeny Goryunov, Lawrence Kotlikoff, Sergey Sinelnikov-Murylev</p>
					<p>Abstract: The fiscal gap is an indicator of the long-term balance of public finance and is calculated based on the intertemporal government budget constraint, which links government tax revenues and expenditures over long intervals. The estimate of the fiscal gap for the Russian general government has been determined according to three scenarios with varying assumptions regarding demographic trends, productivity growth rates, oil and gas prices and the quantity of extractable reserves. The calculations show that the current fiscal policy cannot provide for the stability of public finance in the long run. The main factors of budget imbalances are the growth of pension and health care expenditures caused by demographic trends and the gradual decline in tax receipts from the oil and gas sector.</p>
					<p><a href="https://rujec.org/article/27950/">HTML</a></p>
					<p><a href="https://rujec.org/article/27950/download/xml/">XML</a></p>
					<p><a href="https://rujec.org/article/27950/download/pdf/">PDF</a></p>
			]]></description>
		    <category>Research Article</category>
		    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		</item>
	
	</channel>
</rss>
	