
<rss version="0.91">
    <channel>
        <title>Latest Articles from Russian Journal of Economics</title>
        <description>Latest 3 Articles from Russian Journal of Economics</description>
        <link>https://rujec.org/</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 16:22:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Pensoft FeedCreator</generator>
        
	
		<item>
		    <title>Effectiveness of micro- and macroprudential measures in 2014–2022 in Russia: Endogenous treatment effects estimation</title>
		    <link>https://rujec.org/article/144107/</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[
					<p>Russian Journal of Economics 11(2): 168-196</p>
					<p>DOI: 10.32609/j.ruje.11.144107</p>
					<p>Authors: Maria S. Lymar, Henry I. Penikas</p>
					<p>Abstract: The objective of the current work is to estimate to what extent support measures of the Bank of Russia and the Government of the Russian Federation promoted financial stability of banks and the financial market overall so to sustain lending economy-wide during the crisis periods of 2014, 2020, and 2022. These measures mutually assured the financial stability of the institutions and enabled them to extend lending within the economy for RUB 8 trillion in 2022 (~$100 billion, or 8%+ of the total loan book), of which Bank of Russia measures contributed to RUB 4.3 trillion of the total, the Government of Russia — to RUB 2.0 trillion, while the synergy was RUB 1.7 trillion.</p>
					<p><a href="https://rujec.org/article/144107/">HTML</a></p>
					<p><a href="https://rujec.org/article/144107/download/xml/">XML</a></p>
					<p><a href="https://rujec.org/article/144107/download/pdf/">PDF</a></p>
			]]></description>
		    <category>Research Article</category>
		    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2025 10:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		</item>
	
		<item>
		    <title>Improving pension savings investing: The case of Russia</title>
		    <link>https://rujec.org/article/115594/</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[
					<p>Russian Journal of Economics 10(1): 34-59</p>
					<p>DOI: 10.32609/j.ruje.10.115594</p>
					<p>Authors: Alexander E. Abramov, Maria I. Chernova</p>
					<p>Abstract: Many countries seek to improve their pension systems by introducing corporate and individual savings plans to address the challenges of demography, social security, and economy. However, the establishing of a long-term, reliable savings system encounters multiple impediments. The retrospective analysis of Russian pension reforms offers some recommendations on solving the typical problems faced by reformers. Thus, in 2002 the Russian pension system was implemented by a mandatory savings pillar, which 20 years later the Ministry of Finance substituted by voluntary savings. As this period appeared shorter than the average life span, this measure proved ineffective in increasing pension payouts for future retirees. The frequent regulatory changes and the shrinking workforce coverage as the state prioritized the welfare of the current pension recipients also infringed upon the interests of future retirees. Pension savings investments were further affected by the economic policy aimed at the minimal return requirements which resulted in a more conservative asset allocation strategy and inefficient active management in non-state pension funds. The study demonstrates that policy actions to overcome these impediments and to raise the replacement rates for future retirees should include (a) steady regulations within a pension savings system of no shorter than 40 years; (b) the savings pillar covering no less than 80% of the workforce; and (c) the asset allocation strategy involving a bigger share of equity, longer time horizon and clear benchmarks. These recommendations can be applied to emerging market economies concerned with improving and reforming their pension systems.</p>
					<p><a href="https://rujec.org/article/115594/">HTML</a></p>
					<p><a href="https://rujec.org/article/115594/download/xml/">XML</a></p>
					<p><a href="https://rujec.org/article/115594/download/pdf/">PDF</a></p>
			]]></description>
		    <category>Research Article</category>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2024 20:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		</item>
	
		<item>
		    <title>Brazil in the 21st century: A difficult path</title>
		    <link>https://rujec.org/article/78432/</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[
					<p>Russian Journal of Economics 7(3): 250-268</p>
					<p>DOI: 10.32609/j.ruje.7.78432</p>
					<p>Authors: Leonid M. Grigoryev, Marina F. Starodubtseva</p>
					<p>Abstract: Brazilian economic reforms in 21st century have great importance for the international community, especially for other countries of the middle level of development. The authors­ believe that, in spite of all the difficulties and crises, Brazil has made a decisive step forward by reforming its social structure and retaining democracy. Social reforms (especially­ minimal wage) led to strengthening middle class, but also to elevating its social aspirations. At this dramatic junction the economic development of the country was aggravated by external shocks and unsuccessful budget policies. The complex interaction of social macro­economic policies in Brazil with strong external shocks gives lessons to countries with similar characteristics. The pandemic and recession of 2020–2021 have made the path of development more complicated but there is room for optimism for Brazil in the long run.</p>
					<p><a href="https://rujec.org/article/78432/">HTML</a></p>
					<p><a href="https://rujec.org/article/78432/download/xml/">XML</a></p>
					<p><a href="https://rujec.org/article/78432/download/pdf/">PDF</a></p>
			]]></description>
		    <category>Research Article</category>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 3 Dec 2021 18:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		</item>
	
	</channel>
</rss>
	