
<rss version="0.91">
    <channel>
        <title>Latest Articles from Russian Journal of Economics</title>
        <description>Latest 2 Articles from Russian Journal of Economics</description>
        <link>https://rujec.org/</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 04:30:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Pensoft FeedCreator</generator>
        
	
		<item>
		    <title>Assessing the ability of output gap estimates to forecast inflation in emerging countries</title>
		    <link>https://rujec.org/article/126000/</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[
					<p>Russian Journal of Economics 11(2): 144-167</p>
					<p>DOI: 10.32609/j.ruje.11.126000</p>
					<p>Authors: Nwabisa Florence Ndzama</p>
					<p>Abstract: We find that, while different models used to estimate the output gap in five major emerging economies show similar trends over time, they lead to different conclusions about how well the output gap can predict inflation. This suggests that the choice of model can significantly impact the conclusions drawn about the relationship between the output gap and inflation. The multivariate Hodrick–Prescott filter and the structural vector autoregressive model produce the smallest forecast errors in most cases among the four output gap models considered. We further find some indications of a better inflation forecasting ability of the output gap in countries with inflation targeting, suggesting that the improved transparency related to inflation targeting might support the inflation forecasting process.</p>
					<p><a href="https://rujec.org/article/126000/">HTML</a></p>
					<p><a href="https://rujec.org/article/126000/download/xml/">XML</a></p>
					<p><a href="https://rujec.org/article/126000/download/pdf/">PDF</a></p>
			]]></description>
		    <category>Research Article</category>
		    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2025 10:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		</item>
	
		<item>
		    <title>Potential of business uncertainty indicators in forecasting economic activity: The case of Russia</title>
		    <link>https://rujec.org/article/113578/</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[
					<p>Russian Journal of Economics 10(4): 351-364</p>
					<p>DOI: 10.32609/j.ruje.10.113578</p>
					<p>Authors: Inna S. Lola, Dmitry G. Asoskov</p>
					<p>Abstract: This study investigates the utility of business uncertainty indicators as predictive tools for forecasting economic activity in the context of Russia. In an era characterized by global economic volatility and geopolitical shifts, understanding the dynamics of economic uncertainty and its impact on overall economic performance is of paramount importance. The study utilizes a comprehensive dataset based on the results of business tendency surveys in Russia, spanning the period from 2009 to the first half of 2024. Given the importance of uncertainty in shaping economic outcomes, the central research question of this study is: can uncertainty indicators predict business activity in Russia or not? To address this question, we compared two alternative approaches to calculating business uncertainty: the ex‑ante approach, which uses the business community’s assessments of future business trends to measure uncertainty as the dispersion of opinions expressed, and the ex‑post approach, which applies entrepreneurial assessments of both future and current trends to determine business uncertainty as the degree of deviation of entrepreneurial expectations from the real picture. National indicators and sectoral indicators were calculated for the mining and quarrying industry, manufacturing industry, construction, retail trade, wholesale trade and services. For most of the industries under consideration (except for the construction and service sector) and at the national level, the specifications of vector autoregression models that were effective for forecasting real indicators of economic activity, characterized by lower forecast errors compared to standard autoregressive models, were built. According to the results obtained, at the national level, when forecasting GDP, clear preference should be given to the ex‑post indicator.</p>
					<p><a href="https://rujec.org/article/113578/">HTML</a></p>
					<p><a href="https://rujec.org/article/113578/download/xml/">XML</a></p>
					<p><a href="https://rujec.org/article/113578/download/pdf/">PDF</a></p>
			]]></description>
		    <category>Research Article</category>
		    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Dec 2024 16:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		</item>
	
	</channel>
</rss>
	