Research Article
Other versions:
- ContentsContents
- Article InfoArticle Info
- CiteCite
- MetricsMetrics
- CommentComment
- RelatedRelated
- FigsFigs
- RefsRefs
- CitedCited
-
Article title
-
Abstract
-
Keywords
-
1. Introduction
-
2. Some indications from the literature
-
2.1. Initial syntheses
-
2.2. Recent developments
-
2.3. A different perspective
-
-
3. Revisiting bilateral monopoly’s model
-
3.1. Bilateral monopoly with zero transaction costs
-
3.2. Bilateral monopoly with positive transaction costs and externalities
-
3.3. Bilateral monopoly with positive transaction costs and structural alternatives for internalizing externalities
-
-
4. Three illustrative cases
-
4.1. MMK — RUSAL
-
4.2. Sayanskhimplast — Rosneft
-
4.3. Uralkali — Solikamsk Magnesium Plant
-
3.4. Some lessons from these cases
-
-
5. The role of antitrust authority
-
5.1. Bilateral monopoly in Russian legislation
-
5.2. Alternative modes of intervention
-
-
6. Conclusions
-
Acknowledgements
-
References
Subscribe to email alerts for current Article's categories